Hi, I have just had a quite unexpected 'low memory situation'... This is a AMD64 machine with 2 gig memory, running 64 bit userland. Kernel: 2.6.23-rc3-git10, updating to -rc5-* as soon as i can. I'm using SLUB:s To me, this looks odd... I thought that any cached memory would be reclamed but it was always full. Ideas? One example from dmesg: swapper: page allocation failure. order:1, mode:0x4020 Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff8026c7ef>] __alloc_pages+0x30f/0x330 [<ffffffff8028a0a1>] __slab_alloc+0x141/0x590 [<ffffffff805a5937>] __netdev_alloc_skb+0x17/0x40 [<ffffffff805a5937>] __netdev_alloc_skb+0x17/0x40 [<ffffffff8028b470>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0xa0/0xc0 [<ffffffff805a4b3f>] __alloc_skb+0x6f/0x150 [<ffffffff805a5937>] __netdev_alloc_skb+0x17/0x40 [<ffffffff88010945>] :sky2:sky2_rx_alloc+0x25/0xf0 [<ffffffff88013b0c>] :sky2:sky2_poll+0x6dc/0xcf0 [<ffffffff805e5f60>] tcp_delack_timer+0x0/0x210 [<ffffffff805ac38a>] net_rx_action+0x8a/0x140 [<ffffffff80242ac9>] __do_softirq+0x69/0xe0 [<ffffffff8020cd9c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 [<ffffffff8020eb75>] do_softirq+0x35/0x90 [<ffffffff8020ede0>] do_IRQ+0x80/0x100 [<ffffffff8020ad00>] default_idle+0x0/0x40 [<ffffffff8020c121>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa <EOI> [<ffffffff8020ad29>] default_idle+0x29/0x40 [<ffffffff8020ade1>] cpu_idle+0xa1/0xf0 Mem-info: DMA per-cpu: CPU 0: Hot: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 Cold: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 CPU 1: Hot: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 Cold: hi: 0, btch: 1 usd: 0 DMA32 per-cpu: CPU 0: Hot: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 163 Cold: hi: 62, btch: 15 usd: 56 CPU 1: Hot: hi: 186, btch: 31 usd: 33 Cold: hi: 62, btch: 15 usd: 60 Active:348343 inactive:122950 dirty:13504 writeback:0 unstable:0 free:2665 slab:21427 mapped:243884 pagetables:4816 bounce:0 DMA free:8020kB min:20kB low:24kB high:28kB active:16kB inactive:0kB present:7636kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2003 2003 2003 DMA32 free:2640kB min:5716kB low:7144kB high:8572kB active:1393356kB inactive:491800kB present:2052008kB pages_scanned:22 all_unreclaimable? no lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 DMA: 1*4kB 0*8kB 1*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 2*128kB 3*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 1*2048kB 1*4096kB = 8020kB DMA32: 400*4kB 0*8kB 1*16kB 0*32kB 2*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2640kB Swap cache: add 985117, delete 960396, find 102684/214435, race 0+193 Free swap = 2136272kB Total swap = 2530180kB Free swap: 2136272kB 524208 pages of RAM 10098 reserved pages 588916 pages shared 24719 pages swap cached vmstat procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 0 1 393904 16108 13788 1583372 2 1 229 67 9 8 4 2 92 2 -- Ian Kumlien <pomac () vapor ! com> -- http://pomac.netswarm.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cache not being reclaimed?
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: Cache not being reclaimed?
- Prev by Date: [PATCH -mm] ufs: Fix mount check in ufs_fill_super()
- Next by Date: Re: kernel 2.6.22: what IS the VM doing?
- Previous by thread: tbench regression - Why process scheduler has impact on tbench and why small per-cpu slab (SLUB) cache creates the scenario?
- Next by thread: Re: Cache not being reclaimed?
- Index(es):