Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?

Anton Arapov wrote:

  Hey guys, the future of this patch is important for me. What do you think, has this patch any chances to be committed to upstream?

James Pearson <[email protected]> writes:

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
There isn't that much that is duplicated - and there are also bits of
the /proc/PID/mem code that are not needed in this case, so I'm not
really sure if it is worth doing.

I did submit a patch a few months ago - see:

<http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117862109623007&w=2>

Looks reasonable to me, except for the one overlong line.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?
    • From: James Pearson <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?
    • From: "Guy Streeter" <[email protected]>
  • Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?
    • From: James Pearson <[email protected]>
  • Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?
    • From: Anton Arapov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?
• Next by Date: Re: ramdisk
• Previous by thread: Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?
• Next by thread: Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]