Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?

  Hey guys, the future of this patch is important for me. What do you think, has this patch any chances to be committed to upstream?

James Pearson <[email protected]> writes:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> There isn't that much that is duplicated - and there are also bits of
> the /proc/PID/mem code that are not needed in this case, so I'm not
> really sure if it is worth doing.
>
> I did submit a patch a few months ago - see:
>
> <http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117862109623007&w=2>

-- 
Anton Arapov, <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?
    • From: "Guy Streeter" <[email protected]>
  • Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?
    • From: James Pearson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/7] blk_end_request: changing "normal" drivers
• Next by Date: Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?
• Previous by thread: Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?
• Next by thread: Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]