Re: [PATCH 09/32] Unionfs: cache-coherency - dentries

On Sep 3 2007 10:08, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
>> >+int is_newer_lower(const struct dentry *dentry)
>> 
>> Could use bool and true/false as return value.
> 
>I remember that way back when there was a discussion about the bool type.
>What how did that end? Is bool preferred?

Well if there were objections, it would not be in the tree.


	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs/fsstack/eCryptfs updates/cleanups/fixes
    • From: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 09/32] Unionfs: cache-coherency - dentries
    • From: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 09/32] Unionfs: cache-coherency - dentries
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 09/32] Unionfs: cache-coherency - dentries
    • From: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 09/32] Unionfs: cache-coherency - dentries
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Send quota messages via netlink
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 09/32] Unionfs: cache-coherency - dentries
• Next by thread: [PATCH 1/1] Unionfs: cache-coherency - dentries
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]