Igor Sobrado wrote:
When code is multi-licensed it must be distributed under *all* these licensing terms concurrently. It is easy to understand. Removing (or changing) the conditions that apply to the program from the source code and documentation *without* an authorization from all the author(s) is illegal.
The plain English in the dual-license text directly contradicts this fiction.
Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- From: "Constantine A. Murenin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- From: "Constantine A. Murenin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- From: Igor Sobrado <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- From: Igor Sobrado <[email protected]>
- Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.23-rc3: sysfs_remove_bin_file: bad dentry or inode or no such file: "descriptors"
- Next by Date: Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- Previous by thread: Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- Next by thread: Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- Index(es):
 |