On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:15:45 PDT, Andrew Morton said: > So it's an interaction between the x86_64 vdso patches in Andi's tree and > newer glibc, and we don't know which one is getting it wrong yet? > > If I ever get another -mm out the door (have been without electricity for > several days) I'll drop the vdso changes until this is sorted out. Don't bother, I tested this last night against a vanilla 2.6.23-rc3 kernel and it had the same issue as well. So Andi's vdso patches in his tree and/or the -mm kernel aren't to blame - it's in mainline as well. And it's been in for a while - I also hit it with a 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 kernel.
Attachment:
pgpCvUrZHjcYa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 - vdso and gettimeofday issues with glibc
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 - vdso and gettimeofday issues with glibc
- References:
- 2.6.23-rc3-mm1
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1
- From: [email protected]
- Re: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 - vdso and gettimeofday issues with glibc
- From: [email protected]
- Re: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 - vdso and gettimeofday issues with glibc
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- 2.6.23-rc3-mm1
- Prev by Date: parse_tag_ramdisk
- Next by Date: Re: speeding up swapoff
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 - vdso and gettimeofday issues with glibc
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 - vdso and gettimeofday issues with glibc
- Index(es):