-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Morton wrote:
> So it's an interaction between the x86_64 vdso patches in Andi's tree and
> newer glibc, and we don't know which one is getting it wrong yet?
glibc does nothing but call the code in the vdso. We have a function
pointer variable which either has the old vsyscall value or the address
of the function in the vdso. Everything else is identical. Unless the
interface of the vdso function is different (which it shouldn't) I don't
think you can blame glibc.
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG1i+K2ijCOnn/RHQRArogAKC3zBeyOzqJRF+x2zj3fBg9iGLdyQCgx9Z3
dv3Izh65+kxKedza6RH3MHk=
=qEdC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
