Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007, Michael Kerrisk wrote:

> Davide -- ping!  Can you please offer your comments about this change, and
> also thoughts on Jon's and my comments about a more radical API change
> later  in this thread.

IMO the complexity of the resulting API (and resulting patch), and the ABI 
change, is not justified by the added value.



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
  - From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net>

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
  - From: "Michael Kerrisk" <mtk-manpages@gmx.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Deprecate sys_sysctl in a user space visible fashion.
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]