On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 15:13 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > How about asking for changes to be dual-licenced too ? In theory, that could work, but in practice relying on functions that the Linux kernel offers in GPLv2-only headers etc. will make the result GPLv2 anyway, and disentangling it would be a nightmare. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2
- From: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2
- From: "Jiri Slaby" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2
- From: Xavier Bestel <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2
- Prev by Date: Re: [KJ][patch 3/3] VIDC20: use abs() from kernel.h instead of own definition
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Revised timerfd() interface
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2
- Next by thread: [PATCH 5/5] Net: ath5k, kconfig changes
- Index(es):
 |