Re: [PATCH] Add source address to sunrpc svc errors

[Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu]

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:43:33 EDT, "J. Bruce Fields" said:

> Looks like a reasonable idea to me, thanks!  Any objection to just
> calling it "svc_printk" instead of "svc_printkerr"?
> 
> I also wonder whether these shouldn't all be dprintk's instead of
> printk's.  One misbehaving client could create a lot of noise in the
> logs.

I shouldn't have to rebuild my kernel with debugging enabled just to see
who is throwing trash at my machine.  printk(KERN_INFO maybe and/or using
a printk_ratelimit.

Attachment: pgp4e2v38CFcV.pgp
Description: PGP signature