Re: [PATCH] Add source address to sunrpc svc errors

["Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>]

Hi Randy,
  Thanks for your comments,

* Randy Dunlap (randy.dunlap@oracle.com) wrote:
  in reply to my patch:

> > +static int
> > +svc_printkerr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, const char* fmt,...)
> 
> add:
> 	__attribute__ ((format (printf, 2, 3)))
> so that the compiler can check the args list.

Added.

> > +	printk("svc: %s :", svc_print_addr(rqstp, buf, sizeof(buf)));
> 
> some KERN_* level, please.

I've gone with KERN_WARNING which seems about right.

Here is a v2 of the patch that adds those two fixes and also
tidies up the output a little.

Dave
-- 
 -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert    | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy  \ 
\ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM,SPARC,PPC & HPPA | In Hex /
 \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org   |_______/

----------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
  This patch adds the address of the client that caused an
error in sunrpc/svc.c so that you get errors that look like:

svc: 192.168.66.28, port=709: unknown version (3 for prog 100003, nfsd)

I've seen machines which get bunches of unknown version or similar
errors from time to time, and while the recent patch to add
the service helps to find which service has the wrong version it doesn't
help find the potentially bad client.

  The patch is against a checkout of Linus's git tree made
on 2007-08-24.

  One observation is that the svc_print_addr function
prints to a buffer which in this case makes life a little more complex;
it just feels as if there must be lots of places that print a
connection address - is there a better function to use anywhere?

I think actually there are a few places with semi duplicated code; e.g.
one_sock_name switches on the address family but only currently
has IPV4; I wonder how many other places are similar.

Dave

    Signed-off-by: Dave Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>

--- linux-2.6/net/sunrpc/svc.c.predag	2007-08-25 00:50:06.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/net/sunrpc/svc.c	2007-08-25 15:53:36.000000000 +0100
@@ -777,6 +777,30 @@ svc_register(struct svc_serv *serv, int 
 }
 
 /*
+ * Printk the given error with the address of the client that caused it.
+ */
+static int
+__attribute__ ((format (printf, 2, 3)))
+svc_printkerr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, const char *fmt, ...)
+{
+	va_list args;
+	int 	r;
+	char 	buf[RPC_MAX_ADDRBUFLEN];
+
+	if (!net_ratelimit())
+		return 0;
+
+	printk(KERN_WARNING "svc: %s: ",
+		svc_print_addr(rqstp, buf, sizeof(buf)));
+
+	va_start(args, fmt);
+	r = vprintk(fmt, args);
+	va_end(args);
+
+	return r;
+}
+
+/*
  * Process the RPC request.
  */
 int
@@ -963,14 +987,13 @@ svc_process(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
 	return 0;
 
 err_short_len:
-	if (net_ratelimit())
-		printk("svc: short len %Zd, dropping request\n", argv->iov_len);
+	svc_printkerr(rqstp, "short len %Zd, dropping request\n",
+			argv->iov_len);
 
 	goto dropit;			/* drop request */
 
 err_bad_dir:
-	if (net_ratelimit())
-		printk("svc: bad direction %d, dropping request\n", dir);
+	svc_printkerr(rqstp, "bad direction %d, dropping request\n", dir);
 
 	serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++;
 	goto dropit;			/* drop request */
@@ -1000,8 +1023,7 @@ err_bad_prog:
 	goto sendit;
 
 err_bad_vers:
-	if (net_ratelimit())
-		printk("svc: unknown version (%d for prog %d, %s)\n",
+	svc_printkerr(rqstp, "unknown version (%d for prog %d, %s)\n",
 		       vers, prog, progp->pg_name);
 
 	serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++;
@@ -1011,16 +1033,14 @@ err_bad_vers:
 	goto sendit;
 
 err_bad_proc:
-	if (net_ratelimit())
-		printk("svc: unknown procedure (%d)\n", proc);
+	svc_printkerr(rqstp, "unknown procedure (%d)\n", proc);
 
 	serv->sv_stats->rpcbadfmt++;
 	svc_putnl(resv, RPC_PROC_UNAVAIL);
 	goto sendit;
 
 err_garbage:
-	if (net_ratelimit())
-		printk("svc: failed to decode args\n");
+	svc_printkerr(rqstp, "failed to decode args\n");
 
 	rpc_stat = rpc_garbage_args;
 err_bad:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/