Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/08/07, Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just
> > getting lost.  Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting
> > transitioned into bugzilla for tracking?
>
> Maybe this was a dumb assumption on my part, but I thought regressions
> were getting rolled over into the next release's list, if they are not
> solved?

I have tried to track all regressions, but it is a lot of work, so I
center on development kernels.

There are two lists (both unmaintained)

http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions_2622
http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions_2621

If you compare them, you will see "New regressions (submitted after
2.6.21 a.k.a. for -stable team)" - a long list of problems reported
after 2.6.21 release. I really do not have time to track issues in
stable releases.

Regards,
Michal

-- 
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux