On 26/08/07, Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 26 2007 15:28, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >> >
> >> > What exactely would using kcalloc() over kzalloc() here buy us?
> >>
> >> technically, nothing.
> >
> >The idea of calloc is that it can check for underflow in parameter.
>
> Actually, overflow.
>
> calloc(0xFFFF0000, 0x1000) => will return NULL
> malloc(0xFFFF0000 * 0x1000) => silent 32 bit multiplication/truncation,
> will allocate less than requested.
>
> >calloc(-1, 10000000) => easy to detect
> >malloc(-1 * 10000000) => malloc(-10000000) => not so trivial
>
Ok, that makes a bit of sense. Thank you.
--
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
