On 26/08/07, Robert P. J. Day <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> > On 24/08/07, Robert P. J. Day <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > actually, i would think kcalloc would be more appropriate here, no?
> > >
> >
> > Why?
> >
> > msp_parts[i] = kzalloc(pcnt * sizeof(struct mtd_partition), GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > seems better to me than
> >
> > msp_parts[i] = kcalloc(1, pcnt * sizeof(struct mtd_partition), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> i was thinking more along the lines of
>
> msp_parts[i] = kcalloc(pcnt, sizeof(struct mtd_partition), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> which was kind of the obvious implication, no?
I guess
> unless there's a
> reason kcalloc() wouldn't work here, this is pretty much what
> kcalloc() was designed for.
>
When Denys brought up the zeroing thing and mentioned kzalloc() I did
consider kcalloc() instead, but kzalloc() makes this allocation nicely
look like the preceding ones visually and I couldn't convince myself
that kcalloc() would give us any real benefit here.
What exactely would using kcalloc() over kzalloc() here buy us?
--
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
