On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> So we need to also check for -1 if !NUMA
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Sorry. No we do not need this fix. The patch is fine as is.
In slab_alloc() the slow path is entered if c->lockless is NULL. So it
does not matter for slow path determination that node_match always returns
1 in the !NUMA case.
c->node only needs to be checked for slow path determination in
slab_free(). And there the node_match is not called.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
