On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Hugh Blemings wrote: > Hi Satyam, All, > > > [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS > > > > Cell Broadband Engine OSS Development <[email protected]> is an > > subscribers-only mailing list. > > > > Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <[email protected]> > > > > [...] > > As per recent discussions... > > The list is moderated for SPAM prevention, messages from valid senders > will be forwarded manually and their email added to the whitelist. > > I've changed the list config so that it no longer generates the > "subscriber-only" notification. So ... if someone (!subscriber && !whitelisted) sends a message, it stays put somewhere till you get to it and determine whether it is relevant or not, and either (1) forward it on to the list if appropriate, or (2) drop it if detected as spam. And no "notifications" are ever sent out to genuine / well-meaning posters during this process. Right? > On this basis I recommended the patch be NAKd so that people aren't put > off copying the list where appropriate. Fair enough, if my understanding (as mentioned above) is correct, then I believe the patch achieved a greater purpose than what it was originally sent out for! Thanks, Satyam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS
- From: Hugh Blemings <[email protected]>
- Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS
- References:
- [PATCH 000 of 6] A few block-layer tidy-up patches.
- From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Satyam Sharma <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Satyam Sharma <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Satyam Sharma <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Satyam Sharma <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS
- From: Satyam Sharma <[email protected]>
- Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS
- From: Hugh Blemings <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 000 of 6] A few block-layer tidy-up patches.
- Prev by Date: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS
- Next by Date: Re: [-mm patch] enforce noreplace-smp in alternative_instructions()
- Previous by thread: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS
- Next by thread: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS
- Index(es):
 |