Re: [patch] sched: skip updating rq's next_balance under null SD

* Siddha, Suresh B <[email protected]> wrote:

> Was playing with sched_smt_power_savings/sched_mc_power_savings and 
> found out that while the scheduler domains are reconstructed when 
> sysfs settings change, rebalance_domains() can get triggered with null 
> domain on other cpus, which is setting next_balance to jiffies + 
> 60*HZ. Resulting in no idle/busy balancing for 60 seconds.
> 
> Fix this.

thanks, applied.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch] sched: skip updating rq's next_balance under null SD
  - From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH]: proc: export a processes resource limits via proc/<pid>
Previous by thread: [patch] sched: skip updating rq's next_balance under null SD
Next by thread: [BUG -rt] circular locking deadlock
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]