Re: [patch] sched: skip updating rq's next_balance under null SD

* Siddha, Suresh B <[email protected]> wrote:

> Was playing with sched_smt_power_savings/sched_mc_power_savings and 
> found out that while the scheduler domains are reconstructed when 
> sysfs settings change, rebalance_domains() can get triggered with null 
> domain on other cpus, which is setting next_balance to jiffies + 
> 60*HZ. Resulting in no idle/busy balancing for 60 seconds.
> 
> Fix this.

thanks, applied.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] sched: skip updating rq's next_balance under null SD
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH]: proc: export a processes resource limits via proc/<pid>
• Previous by thread: [patch] sched: skip updating rq's next_balance under null SD
• Next by thread: [BUG -rt] circular locking deadlock
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]