Re: [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS

* Siddha, Suresh B <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ingo, let me know if there any side effects of this change. Thanks.
> ---
> 
> On a four package system with HT - HT load balancing optimizations 
> were broken. For example, if two tasks end up running on two logical 
> threads of one of the packages, scheduler is not able to pull one of 
> the tasks to a completely idle package.

thanks, i've applied your fix to my queue.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: file system for solid state disks
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] sched: skip updating rq's next_balance under null SD
• Previous by thread: [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]