Re: [autofs] [PATCH] autofs4: reinstate negatitive timeout of mount fails

On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 10:56 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 13:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > It seems to use a lot of list_for_each[_safe] which could
> > have been coded as list_for_each_entry[_safe], btw.
> 
> Mmm .. good point. I've not noticed the list_for_each_entry* macros.

A good idea but that change would cover more than just this patch so I'd
rather leave the patch as is and submit a cleanup patch to cover this
later.

Ian


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] autofs4: reinstate negatitive timeout of mount fails
    • From: Ian Kent <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] autofs4: reinstate negatitive timeout of mount fails
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] autofs4: reinstate negatitive timeout of mount fails
    • From: Ian Kent <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: How to learn Linux Kernel Programming
• Next by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [4/4] 2.6.23-rc3: known regressions
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] autofs4: reinstate negatitive timeout of mount fails
• Next by thread: SDRAM problem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]