On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 02:18 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > That's precisely a subscribers-only list. At least as per MAINTAINER's > definition of that term. It'd be surprising to know of a mailing list > mentioned in MAINTAINERS that _drops_ messages posted to it entirely! Here's one possibility, though I did sent messages that some might have considered spam: [email protected] This one isn't marked as subscriber only either. On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 14:00 -0400, [email protected] wrote: > Vous n'êtes pas autorisé à envoyer des messages sur cette liste, votre > message a été automatiquement rejeté. Si vous pensez que votre message > a été rejeté par erreur, veuillez contacter le gestionnaire de la > liste à l'adresse [email protected]. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 000 of 6] A few block-layer tidy-up patches.
- From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Satyam Sharma <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Satyam Sharma <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Satyam Sharma <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Satyam Sharma <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS
- From: Satyam Sharma <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS
- From: Geoff Levand <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS
- From: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS
- From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS
- From: Geoff Levand <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS
- From: Satyam Sharma <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 000 of 6] A few block-layer tidy-up patches.
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC 0/7] Postphone reclaim laundry to write at high water marks
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS
- Index(es):
 |