On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 03:49:16PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 23:44 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > Except that some instances are legitimate (e.g. there was a bunch in
> > arch/um, IIRC)...
>
> I guess it's a good thing that vger seems to have rejected
> that 140KB patch I sent against arch/um and include/asm-um.
It would be a better thing if you
* did builds of the patched trees (allmodconfig for uml/i386 and
uml/amd64 in this case)
* figured out that one can send a reference to branch in git tree
(with summary/shortlog/diffstat) using somewhat less than 140KB...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]