Re: convert #include "linux/..." to #include <linux/...> [PATCH]s follow

On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 23:44 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Except that some instances are legitimate (e.g. there was a bunch in
> arch/um, IIRC)...

I guess it's a good thing that vger seems to have rejected
that 140KB patch I sent against arch/um and include/asm-um.

cheers, Joe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: convert #include "linux/..." to #include <linux/...> [PATCH]s follow
  - From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

References:
- convert #include "linux/..." to #include <linux/...> [PATCH]s follow
  - From: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
- Re: convert #include "linux/..." to #include <linux/...> [PATCH]s follow
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: convert #include "linux/..." to #include <linux/...> [PATCH]s follow
  - From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Marvell 88E8056 gigabit ethernet controller
Next by Date: Re: general protection fault with powernow-k8 frequency scaling on x86-64
Previous by thread: Re: convert #include "linux/..." to #include <linux/...> [PATCH]s follow
Next by thread: Re: convert #include "linux/..." to #include <linux/...> [PATCH]s follow
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]