Re: convert #include "linux/..." to #include <linux/...> [PATCH]s follow

On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 23:44 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Except that some instances are legitimate (e.g. there was a bunch in
> arch/um, IIRC)...

I guess it's a good thing that vger seems to have rejected
that 140KB patch I sent against arch/um and include/asm-um.

cheers, Joe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: convert #include "linux/..." to #include <linux/...> [PATCH]s follow
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• References:
  • convert #include "linux/..." to #include <linux/...> [PATCH]s follow
    • From: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
  • Re: convert #include "linux/..." to #include <linux/...> [PATCH]s follow
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: convert #include "linux/..." to #include <linux/...> [PATCH]s follow
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Marvell 88E8056 gigabit ethernet controller
• Next by Date: Re: general protection fault with powernow-k8 frequency scaling on x86-64
• Previous by thread: Re: convert #include "linux/..." to #include <linux/...> [PATCH]s follow
• Next by thread: Re: convert #include "linux/..." to #include <linux/...> [PATCH]s follow
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]