On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 06:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Kevin E <[email protected]> wrote:
> --- Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > OK, in this trace, both controllers are on the same
> > bus. The broken
> > one has 'Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error
> > Reporting' the other
> > does not have, and the bridge to this bus has two
> > more capabilities :
> > 'Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel' and
> > 'Capabilities: [180] Unknown (5)'.
> >
> > I don't know whether it can jutify a different
> > behaviour. Also, maybe this
> > is caused by a minuscule difference in the BIOS
> > setup ?
>
The working board has a different version of the Marvell chip:
$ grep Marvell working-MB
04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8056 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 14)
$ grep Marvell broken-MB
04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8056 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 12)
Not sure if that completely explains the problem because the broken chip on my
system is:
06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8056 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 14)
I don't know what the differences are between versions.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
