Re: [PATCH 002 of 5] Replace bio_data with blk_rq_data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday August 16, [email protected] wrote:
> > 2 and 3 are very simple changes that - I think - make it clearer what
> > is happening.
> 
> To be honest, I don't see much win in using blk_rq_data() over
> bio_data() at all. I'd much much rather just see it go away!
> 

Well, as it is always the data at the (current) head of the request...

But I can make it go a way if you like.. What does it become?
bvec_kmap ??

> > And I felt 5 was a sufficient improvement to justify it and 4...
> 
> 5 is nice, I would like to apply that :-)
> 

OK, here comes '5' at the top of a small set of patches.  Take it and
any of the following that you like.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux