On Thu, Aug 16 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Thursday August 16, [email protected] wrote:
> > > 2 and 3 are very simple changes that - I think - make it clearer what
> > > is happening.
> >
> > To be honest, I don't see much win in using blk_rq_data() over
> > bio_data() at all. I'd much much rather just see it go away!
> >
>
> Well, as it is always the data at the (current) head of the request...
>
> But I can make it go a way if you like.. What does it become?
> bvec_kmap ??
Yeah, it then just becomes a kmap. And ->buffer goes away completely.
> > > And I felt 5 was a sufficient improvement to justify it and 4...
> >
> > 5 is nice, I would like to apply that :-)
> >
>
> OK, here comes '5' at the top of a small set of patches. Take it and
> any of the following that you like.
Thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
