Re: Are we properly prepared to handle 3 Socket setups?

[Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>]

On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Rene Herman wrote:

> > >          /*
> > >           * Maximum threshold is 125
> > >           */
> > >          threshold = min(125, threshold);
> > > 
> > > as either the comment or the code is wrong and it seems it's the code.
> > > Added Andrew Morton to the CC for that.
> > 
> > Yes, that's inconsistent.  And looking at Christoph's df9ecaba it's unclear
> > whether the comment is wrong or the code is wrong.  The code is wrong, I
> > expect.

?? What is wrong with the code? We want the threshold to stay below 125?
 
> On 08/12/2007 05:29 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:
> 
> > What's the problem? That line sets threshold to the smaller of the current
> > value or 125, which is exactly what one would want to do if the
> > maximum value is 125. Just do a couple of examples: eg if threshold is
> > 100 going into that line, then the value is left alone; if threshold is
> > 150 then it gets set to 125; and that seems exactly correct.

Exactly.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/