Re: Are we properly prepared to handle 3 Socket setups?

[Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>]

On 08/12/2007 10:35 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 05:17:10 +0200 Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com> wrote:

> > The line just below where it does that _does_ seem to have a problem:
> >
> >          /*
> >           * Maximum threshold is 125
> >           */
> >          threshold = min(125, threshold);
> >
> > as either the comment or the code is wrong and it seems it's the code. Added 
> > Andrew Morton to the CC for that.
>
> Yes, that's inconsistent.  And looking at Christoph's df9ecaba it's unclear
> whether the comment is wrong or the code is wrong.  The code is wrong, I
> expect.

Extremely friendly of you to pretend I wasn't being thick at all but don't 
worry, I can take it. Anyways, since Christoph wasn't in CC on that one:

On 08/12/2007 05:29 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:

> What's the problem? That line sets threshold to the smaller of the 
> current value or 125, which is exactly what one would want to do if the
> maximum value is 125. Just do a couple of examples: eg if threshold is
> 100 going into that line, then the value is left alone; if threshold is
> 150 then it gets set to 125; and that seems exactly correct.

Rene.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/