Andi Kleen wrote:
richard kennedy <[email protected]> writes:
This is on a standard desktop machine so there are lots of other
processes running on it, and although there is a degree of variability
in the numbers,they are very repeatable and your patch always out
performs the stock mm2.
looks good to me
iirc the goal of this is less to get better performance, but to avoid long user visible
latencies. Of course if it's faster it's great too, but that's only secondary.
What a trade-off, if you want to get rid of long latency you have to
live with better throughput. I can live with that. ;-)
Your point well taken, not the intent of the patch, but it may indicate
where a performance bottleneck happens as well.
--
Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
