Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> But it is good to remove bad interfaces, if we possibly can.
>
> It is worth making the attempt. Does anyone know of anything which will
> break? I fed NET_NEIGH_ANYCAST_DELAY at random into
> http://www.google.com/codesearch and came up with nothing...
My current policy is that since I could only find 5 real world linux
programs that even call sys_sysctl, that if I find a broken sysctl
binary interface I'm lazy and just remove it. The only networking one
I know of is radvd.
Added to that I just pushed an autochecking sysctl patch to Andrew
that fails register_sysctl_table if the sysctl table is broken. And
all of these showed up. So some fix was needed or things would have
been even worse.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]