Hello.
In article <[email protected]> (at Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:56:09 -0600), [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman) says:
>
> - In ipv6 ndisc_ifinfo_syctl_change so it doesn't depend on binary
> sysctl names for a function that works with proc.
>
> - In neighbour.c reorder the table to put the possibly unused entries
> at the end so we can remove them by terminating the table early.
>
> - In neighbour.c kill the entries with questionable binary sysctl
> handling behavior.
>
> - In neighbour.c if we don't have a strategy routine remove the
> binary path. So we don't the default sysctl strategy routine
> on data that is not ready for it.
>
I disagree. It is bad to remove existing interface.
Ditto for other patches.
Regards,
--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
