Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code

> Silly is in the eye of the beholder.  I don't want to take this patch
> because it needs to be reviewed by someone who really knows the intent
> of the driver.  Seems silly to me to blindly take patches.

For unmaintained code we usually work on wackipedia theory ("its probably
right but if not we can revert it/update it cheaply")

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
  - From: Kristen Carlson Accardi <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
  - From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
  - From: Kristen Carlson Accardi <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
  - From: Kristen Carlson Accardi <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.23-rc2-mm1: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:86
Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]