Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code

On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:04:36 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:

> We have tons of unmaintained drivers and none of them has such a silly 
> auto-NAK policy.
> 
> cu
> Adrian

Silly is in the eye of the beholder.  I don't want to take this patch
because it needs to be reviewed by someone who really knows the intent
of the driver.  Seems silly to me to blindly take patches.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

References:
- [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
  - From: Kristen Carlson Accardi <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
  - From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
  - From: Kristen Carlson Accardi <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: i386 doublefault handler is broken with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
Next by Date: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]