Re: [PATCH] at91 pm: Compilation fix for at91sam926x

> > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91RM9200)
> >                         at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_SRR, 1);     /*
> > self-refresh mode */

> Why don't use:
> if (cpu_is_at91rm9200())
> at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_SRR, 1);

What is the benefit?
Will the optimizer remove the code if the CPU is not the at91rm9200?

Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] at91 pm: Compilation fix for at91sam926x
    • From: Hans-Jürgen Koch <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] at91 pm: Compilation fix for at91sam926x
    • From: Andy Herzig <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] at91 pm: Compilation fix for at91sam926x
    • From: Hans-Jürgen Koch <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] at91 pm: Compilation fix for at91sam926x
    • From: Marc Pignat <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] cpqphp_ctrl.c: remove dead code
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on alpha
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] at91 pm: Compilation fix for at91sam926x
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] at91 pm: Compilation fix for at91sam926x
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]