On 8/9/07, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote: > > > > Does it really matter? > > > > Well, yes, if alignment is an issue. Of course, But the question rises from the context that they are both together at the beginning. So they are not making anybody non-aligned. Then the question: Why would putting it in the end be different to putting them _together_, aligned at the beginning ? -- Glauber de Oliveira Costa. "Free as in Freedom" http://glommer.net "The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
- Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
- References:
- Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64
- From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
- [PATCH 20/25] [PATCH] replace syscall_init
- From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
- [PATCH 21/25] [PATCH] export cpu_gdt_descr
- From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
- [PATCH 22/25] [PATCH] turn priviled operation into a macro
- From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
- [PATCH 23/25] [PATCH] paravirt hooks for arch initialization
- From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
- [PATCH 24/25] [PATCH] provide paravirt patching function
- From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
- [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
- From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
- Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
- From: "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <glommer@gmail.com>
- Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
- Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] timer:Remove clockevents_unregister_notifier
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
- Index(es):
![]() |