Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64

On 8/9/07, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Does it really matter?
> >
>
> Well, yes, if alignment is an issue.
Of course, But the question rises from the context that they are both
together at the beginning. So they are not making anybody non-aligned.
Then the question: Why would putting it in the end be different to
putting them _together_, aligned at the beginning ?

-- 
Glauber de Oliveira Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"
http://glommer.net

"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 20/25] [PATCH] replace syscall_init
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 21/25] [PATCH] export cpu_gdt_descr
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 22/25] [PATCH] turn priviled operation into a macro
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 23/25] [PATCH] paravirt hooks for arch initialization
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 24/25] [PATCH] provide paravirt patching function
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
    • From: "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] timer:Remove clockevents_unregister_notifier
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]