Re: [PATCH] Remove x86_cpu_to_log_apicid

On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:

> On Wednesday 08 August 2007 23:01, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > From: Mike Travis <[email protected]>
> 
> Why does Mike not submit his patches by himself? 

Its his first patch and I wanted to help out a bit .... He will submit 
them himself in the future.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Remove x86_cpu_to_log_apicid
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Remove x86_cpu_to_log_apicid
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] make atomic_t volatile on all architectures
• Next by Date: Question: sched_rt.c : is RT check needed within a RT func? dequeue_task_rt() calls update_curr_rt() which checks for priority of RR or FIFO :
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove x86_cpu_to_log_apicid
• Next by thread: [PATCH] hex_dump: add missing "const" qualifiers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]