Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64

On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 02:24 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Not sure what's best. Ok using a normal export is easiest and not
> that big an issue.

Yeah, there's also been talk of breaking up paravirt_ops into multiple
structs by area, which would lead naturally into finer-grained export
control.

Cheers,
Rusty.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
    • From: "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Avoid NMI Watchdog and/or long wait in setup_APIC_timer
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Avoid NMI Watchdog and/or long wait in setup_APIC_timer
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]