On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 11:49 -0300, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote: > On 8/8/07, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote: > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(paravirt_ops); > > > > Definitely _GPL at least. > Sure. We ended up making it EXPORT_SYMBOL in i386 because every driver wants to save and restore interrupt state. But questionably-licensed drivers might be less of a concern on x86-64. Cheers, Rusty. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
- References:
- Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64
- From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
- [PATCH 24/25] [PATCH] provide paravirt patching function
- From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
- [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
- From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
- From: "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <glommer@gmail.com>
- Introducing paravirt_ops for x86_64
- Prev by Date: Re: reiserfs fs/reiserfs/bitmap.c:1287
- Next by Date: Re: early boot lockup with 2.6.23-rc1
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 25/25] [PATCH] add paravirtualization support for x86_64
- Index(es):
![]() |