Hello, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> More specifically, d_off field. It's a bit twisted. For the last >> entry, filp->f_pos gets written into the field and gets wrapped while >> being copied out to userland or in glibc. > > That could do it, and glibc is crunching it. Oh well, it is > easy enough to avoid as long as our inode numbers are small which > the idr allocator seems to ensure. Yeah, now I think about it. glibc throws out entries which don't fit in the data structure specified by the called API, so it probably threw out the last entry which has UINT_MAX in d_off which doesn't fit in the readdir() return structure. Using INT_MAX should be just fine as IDA always allocates the first empty slot. We can add paranoia check in ino allocation path. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- References:
- [PATCH 5/5] sysfs: make sysfs_addrm_finish() return void
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
- [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- From: Tejun Heo <teheo@suse.de>
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
- [PATCH 5/5] sysfs: make sysfs_addrm_finish() return void
- Prev by Date: Re: PAT support for i386 and x86_64
- Next by Date: [PATCH] Make UIO available for arm architecture
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/25] Sysfs cleanups & tagged directory support
- Index(es):
![]() |