On Wednesday, 8 August 2007 01:03, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 21:14:01 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Suspend the interface.
> > + */
> > +
> > +static int uli526x_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
>
> Since when did suspend and resume methods become dependent upon CONFIG_PM_SLEEP?
>
> We have eight thousand implementations of this, all of which presently
> use CONFIG_PM.
Yes, they do, but if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set, they won't be used.
Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
