Re: why are some atomic_t's not volatile, while most are?

["Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>]

Chris Snook wrote:

> This is not a problem, since indirect references will cause the CPU to 
> fetch the data from memory/cache anyway.
Isn't Zan's sample code (that shows the problem) already using indirect 
references?
Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/