Re: why are some atomic_t's not volatile, while most are?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Snook wrote:

This is not a problem, since indirect references will cause the CPU to fetch the data from memory/cache anyway.

Isn't Zan's sample code (that shows the problem) already using indirect references?

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux