On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 10:38:44 -0500 James Bottomley <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 11:11 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > James Bottomley wrote:
> > > The initial bsg submit went via the block git tree ... which I believe
> > > you have in -mm. We only started taking the updates via the scsi tree
> >
> > Seven hours before you posted this, in
> > <[email protected]>, Andrew already
> > noted it was not in -mm.
> >
> > A trivial examination of the broken-out mm patches backs up the absence
> > of Jens' block tree, too.
> >
> > So let's put this myth / bad assumption to rest, shall we?
>
> Sorry ... I just assumed from the fact that it had been in the block git
> tree for six months that it was also in -mm.
bsg was never in the #for-akpm branch of git-block. So I assume that
Jens had it in some other branch and for some reason never pulled it
across into #for-akpm.
It was most reasonable of you to expect that bsg had received a decent
run in -mm.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
