(What Peter already wrote, but in different words)
On Monday 06 August 2007 13:19, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> The solution may be as simple as configuring the reserves right and
> avoid the unbounded memory allocations.
Exactly. That is what this patch set is about. This is the part that
provides some hooks to extend the traditional reserves to be able to
handle some of the more difficult situations.
> That is possible if one
> would make sure that the network layer triggers reclaim once in a
> while.
No. It does no good at all for network to do a bunch of work
reclaiming, then have some other random task (for example, a heavy
writer) swoop in and grab the reclaimed memory before net can use it.
Also, net allocates memory in interrupt context where shrink_caches is
not possible. The correct solution is to _reserve_ the memory net
needs for vm writeout, which is in Peter's next patch set coming down
the pipe.
Regards,
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
