On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 23:39:30 +0200 Rafał Bilski (RB) wrote: RB> VT8235 does *NOT* have a HPET(*). Only part which has HPET is VT8237. It RB> is device 00:17.0 too, but only 1106:3227 has HPET enable and memory RB> base registers. VT8235 one and only feature which doesn't have driver RB> yet seems to be hardware watchdog. RB> (*) Datasheet revision 2.03 March 16, 2005 We have an Asrock K7VT4A+ board with VT8235 southbridge in our lab and it does have an HPET. Just because the datasheet does not document HPET does not mean it is not implemented. My guess is that newer revisions of VT8235 have HPET whereas older revisions do not. I'll get an lspci dump from our box tomorrow. Cheers, - Udo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HPET force-enable investigations on Via VT8235
- From: "Udo A. Steinberg" <[email protected]>
- Re: HPET force-enable investigations on Via VT8235
- From: Rafał Bilski <[email protected]>
- Re: HPET force-enable investigations on Via VT8235
- References:
- HPET force-enable investigations on Via VT8235 (was: Re: extra timer interrupt + konqueror)
- From: Andreas Mohr <[email protected]>
- Re: HPET force-enable investigations on Via VT8235
- From: Rafał Bilski <[email protected]>
- HPET force-enable investigations on Via VT8235 (was: Re: extra timer interrupt + konqueror)
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] - Fix typo in Documentation/SubmitChecklist
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: system wide ALLOC_NO_WATERMARK
- Previous by thread: Re: HPET force-enable investigations on Via VT8235
- Next by thread: Re: HPET force-enable investigations on Via VT8235
- Index(es):