Re: [linux-pm] Re: [Resend][PATCH] PM: Fix dependencies of CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION (updated)

[Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>]

On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 13:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:

> config SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE
> 	depends on ARCH_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE
> 
> and then the architecture gets to define that when it can suspend.

In fact, just doing
	depends on (ARCH_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE && !SMP) || (ARCH_SUSPEND_SMP_POSSIBLE && SMP)

would probably be good instead of doing the intermediate
SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE and SUSPEND_SMP_POSSIBLE. The reason I like this
better is that we don't have a central editing point where patches
conflict causing unnecessary problems. But both are much better than
what we have now anyway :)

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part