On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 12:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Well, so that it does not bitrot? This is few bytes, I'd say, and I > believe we have too many config options already. This is not an option the user is ever going to see. I think I'd prefer having two new per-ARCH config symbols though: config SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE depends on ARCH_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE and then the architecture gets to define that when it can suspend. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [Resend][PATCH] PM: Fix dependencies of CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION (updated)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Resend][PATCH] PM: Fix dependencies of CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION (updated)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [Resend][PATCH] PM: Fix dependencies of CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION (updated)
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: [linux-pm] Re: [Resend][PATCH] PM: Fix dependencies of CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION (updated)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- [Resend][PATCH] PM: Fix dependencies of CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION (updated)
- Prev by Date: Re: [NFS] 2.6.23-rc1-mm2
- Next by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.23-rc2
- Previous by thread: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [Resend][PATCH] PM: Fix dependencies of CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION (updated)
- Next by thread: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [Resend][PATCH] PM: Fix dependencies of CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION (updated)
- Index(es):