Re: [PATCH] tiny sched_getaffinity cleanup

* Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> wrote:

> Unless I'm missing something quite tricky here's another tiny cleanup.  
> The generated code is not affected (gcc is smart enough) but for 
> people looking over the code it is just irritating to have the extra 
> conditional.

thanks, i've applied your cleanup to my tree.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] tiny sched_getaffinity cleanup
    • From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -rt 9/9] seqlocks: use PICK_FUNCTION
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pi-futex: set PF_EXITING without taking ->pi_lock
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] tiny sched_getaffinity cleanup
• Next by thread: [SPARC32] NULL pointer derefference
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]