Re: [PATCH] tiny sched_getaffinity cleanup

* Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]> wrote:

> Unless I'm missing something quite tricky here's another tiny cleanup.  
> The generated code is not affected (gcc is smart enough) but for 
> people looking over the code it is just irritating to have the extra 
> conditional.

thanks, i've applied your cleanup to my tree.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] tiny sched_getaffinity cleanup
  - From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -rt 9/9] seqlocks: use PICK_FUNCTION
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pi-futex: set PF_EXITING without taking ->pi_lock
Previous by thread: [PATCH] tiny sched_getaffinity cleanup
Next by thread: [SPARC32] NULL pointer derefference
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]