Re: [PATCH -rt 9/9] seqlocks: use PICK_FUNCTION

* Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Replace the old PICK_OP style macros with PICK_FUNCTION. Although, 
> seqlocks has some alien code, which I also replaced as can be seen 
> from the line count below.

ok, i very much like the cleanup effects here, could you resend your 
latest version of this (with Peter's suggested cleanup) against -rc2-rt2 
so that i can apply it?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH -rt 9/9] seqlocks: use PICK_FUNCTION
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH -rt 1/9] preempt rcu: check for underflow
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH -rt 9/9] seqlocks: use PICK_FUNCTION
    • From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RESEND] [BUG] futex_unlock_pi() hurts my brain and may cause application deadlock
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] tiny sched_getaffinity cleanup
• Previous by thread: [PATCH -rt 9/9] seqlocks: use PICK_FUNCTION
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -rt 9/9] seqlocks: use PICK_FUNCTION
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]