Re: [PATCH -rt 9/9] seqlocks: use PICK_FUNCTION

* Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Replace the old PICK_OP style macros with PICK_FUNCTION. Although, 
> seqlocks has some alien code, which I also replaced as can be seen 
> from the line count below.

ok, i very much like the cleanup effects here, could you resend your 
latest version of this (with Peter's suggested cleanup) against -rc2-rt2 
so that i can apply it?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH -rt 9/9] seqlocks: use PICK_FUNCTION
  - From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH -rt 1/9] preempt rcu: check for underflow
  - From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- [PATCH -rt 9/9] seqlocks: use PICK_FUNCTION
  - From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RESEND] [BUG] futex_unlock_pi() hurts my brain and may cause application deadlock
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] tiny sched_getaffinity cleanup
Previous by thread: [PATCH -rt 9/9] seqlocks: use PICK_FUNCTION
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -rt 9/9] seqlocks: use PICK_FUNCTION
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]