Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Theodore Tso <[email protected]> wrote:

If you are always reading from the same small set of files (i.e., a database workload), then those inodes only get updated every 5 seconds (the traditional/default metadata update sync time, as well as the default ext3 journal update time), it's no big deal. Or if you are running a mail server, most of the time the mail queue files are getting updated anyway as you process them, and usually the mail is delivered before 5 seconds is up anyway.

So earlier, when Ingo characterized it as, "whenever you read from a file, even one in memory cache.... do a write!", it's probably a bit unfair. Traditional Unix systems simply had very different workload characteristics than many modern dekstop systems today.

yeah, i didnt mean to say that it is _always_ a big issue, but "only a small number of files are read" is a very, very small minority of even the database server world.

OTOH, consider a popular Linux task, web serving. atime results in a lot of unnecessary disk traffic.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux