Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar wrote:
Distro makers did not dare to do this sooner because some kernel developers came forward with these mostly bogus arguments ... The impact of atime is far better understood by the kernel community, so it is the responsibility of _us_ to signal such things towards distributors, not the other way around.


Pretty much.

AFAICS there was never a "policy decision" on the part of distro makers to begin with. The kernel had its default -- atime -- and the distros ran with that.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux