Re: [ck] Re: ck vs. cfs : realtime audio performance

[Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>]

Am Donnerstag 02 August 2007 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:

> The tone I see on responses to posts that are CCed to LKML in my
> perception often is just completely and utterly awfully unfriendly. And
> often those responses actual include factual inaccuracies and
> preliminary assumptions as well. Is that how Linux Kernel Management
> Style is supposed to work? I hope not. [...]

Well, if Carlo is not a Linux Kernel manager this comment of mine is 
inapprobiate. Sorry for that.

Actually when I remind myself of all the responses I got from Ingo I did 
not see anything like that what I have complained about here. I take that 
as something where I can learn something: Not nearly every Linux Kernel 
manager is a mean and unfriendly bastard who accuses everyone who wants 
something merged or has a problem report. ;) (At least Ingo did not 
accuse me for my problem reports. If I ever happen to dig that deeply 
into the kernel or its documentation that I have something to merge 
regarding the scheduler, I can try how he reacts to that...)

-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/