Am Donnerstag 02 August 2007 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> The tone I see on responses to posts that are CCed to LKML in my
> perception often is just completely and utterly awfully unfriendly. And
> often those responses actual include factual inaccuracies and
> preliminary assumptions as well. Is that how Linux Kernel Management
> Style is supposed to work? I hope not. [...]
Well, if Carlo is not a Linux Kernel manager this comment of mine is
inapprobiate. Sorry for that.
Actually when I remind myself of all the responses I got from Ingo I did
not see anything like that what I have complained about here. I take that
as something where I can learn something: Not nearly every Linux Kernel
manager is a mean and unfriendly bastard who accuses everyone who wants
something merged or has a problem report. ;) (At least Ingo did not
accuse me for my problem reports. If I ever happen to dig that deeply
into the kernel or its documentation that I have something to merge
regarding the scheduler, I can try how he reacts to that...)
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
